<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cyberlaw Central &#187; Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/category/open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com</link>
	<description>The digital world, its impact and legal framework</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin A. Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;m not a patent attorney, I was drawn to news of Microsoft&#8217;s statement in a Fortune article that free and Open Source software violated 235 of its patents. Mary Jo Foley covered the news in detail here. In particular, the claim was made by Microsoft&#8217;s Horacio Gutierrez that the Linux kernel violates 42 Microsoft [...]<p><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/">Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com">Cyberlaw Central</a></p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com">Cyberlaw Central</a>.</p>
<p><b>Share on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&t=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank">Facebook</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents – http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/" title="Click to send this page to Twitter!" target="_blank">Twitter</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Stumbleupon</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Digg</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;		
<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Reddit</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailFlare?itemTitle=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents&uri=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/" target="_blank" >Email to friend</a></b></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m not a patent attorney, I was drawn to news of Microsoft&#8217;s statement in a Fortune article that free and Open Source software violated 235 of its patents. <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=436" target="_blank">Mary Jo Foley covered the news in detail here</a>. In particular, the claim was made by Microsoft&#8217;s Horacio Gutierrez that the Linux kernel violates 42 Microsoft patents, Linux graphical user interfaces violate 65, Open Office violates 45, some e-mail programs violate 15 more, and others violate another 68 patents. As a happy user of OpenOffice, I am concerned as well.<br />
Microsoft has addressed its patents in other open source software by granting licenses, it is unclear currently whether this is a declaration of war by Microsoft to preempt the upcoming version 3 of the GPL, or possibly a bargaining chip to increase its leverage. Only time will tell.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to get a reaction to this news from a Patent attorney, either privately by email or in the comments.</p>
<p><em>UPDATED TO ADD</em>: <a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/05/microsoft_foss_.html" target="_blank">You can read Dennis Crouch at Patently O&#8217;s take on the statement here</a>, be sure to check out the comments, too.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/06/17/musings-on-backwards-compatability-for-windows/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Musings on backwards compatability for Windows</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/08/27/microsoft-damned-if-you-do/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Microsoft: Damned if you do.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2006/01/17/truly-anonymous-web-surfing-realized-on-a-cd/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Truly Anonymous Web Surfing: Realized on a CD?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/09/30/battle-lines-being-drawn-law-enforcement-v-internet-freedoms/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Battle Lines being Drawn &#8211; Law Enforcement v. Internet Freedoms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2006/01/09/out-of-the-box-with-wireless/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Out of the Box with Wireless</a></li></ul></div><p><a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/">Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com">Cyberlaw Central</a></p>
<p>&copy;2010 <a href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com">Cyberlaw Central</a>.</p>
<p><b>Share on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&t=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank">Facebook</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents – http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/" title="Click to send this page to Twitter!" target="_blank">Twitter</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Stumbleupon</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Digg</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;		
<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/&title=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents" target="_blank" >Reddit</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;
<a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailFlare?itemTitle=Microsoft claims Open Source software violates its patents&uri=http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/" target="_blank" >Email to friend</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2007/05/14/microsoft-claims-open-source-software-violates-its-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
