<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musings on DMCA Takedown Provisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/06/18/musings-on-dmca-takedown-provisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/06/18/musings-on-dmca-takedown-provisions/</link>
	<description>The digital world, its impact and legal framework</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:52:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/06/18/musings-on-dmca-takedown-provisions/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyberlawcentral.com/2005/06/18/musings-on-dmca-takedown-provisions/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Section 512(f) should do a pretty good job of stopping the unscrupulous, as it would put him or her on the hook big time for knowingly making any material misrepresentation about the copyright status.  See, e.g., the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/legpolicy/opg_v_diebold&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OPG v. Diebold&lt;/a&gt; case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 512(f) should do a pretty good job of stopping the unscrupulous, as it would put him or her on the hook big time for knowingly making any material misrepresentation about the copyright status.  See, e.g., the <a href="http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/legpolicy/opg_v_diebold" rel="nofollow">OPG v. Diebold</a> case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
